http://mellowmelon.wordpress.com/ ([identity profile] mellowmelon.wordpress.com) wrote in [personal profile] zotmeister 2012-05-03 07:46 pm (UTC)

I think I know what you mean when you speak of the node count being useful, but it only works sometimes, correct? I did use that trick for the later ones. Well, it's not so much that determining whether the S can go in a space or not is hard as that it's an annoying hiccup to deal with.

I perfectly understand what you mean about narrative; one of my top priorities when constructing is to make a puzzle that has my footprint on it. And I can see how such a feature in the rules is a big help for doing that and the advantages to doing so. Still, my preference is to avoid it and find other ways to give that distinctive experience. The last time I remember dealing with this in my own constructions was for the Interior Path variation on Slitherlink; there I pretty much always make the endpoints obvious within the first 1/4 of the puzzle, if not immediately.

And my apologies for the slight spoiler. I meant it to say it only for 63, then botched the wording (frequent habit of mine) and ended up accidentally saying something correct about 67 too.

Post a comment in response:

From:
Anonymous( )Anonymous This account has disabled anonymous posting.
OpenID( )OpenID You can comment on this post while signed in with an account from many other sites, once you have confirmed your email address. Sign in using OpenID.
User
Account name:
Password:
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
Subject:
HTML doesn't work in the subject.

Message:

 
Notice: This account is set to log the IP addresses of everyone who comments.
Links will be displayed as unclickable URLs to help prevent spam.